Royalty Free Photo news

Wedding photography is on the top list of priorities when planning for the big day. Hiring a pro who runs a photography business to cover all of the jobs is the best idea you can have. In this article, you will be able to get some tips that you will find quite handy for wedding photography.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

One of the more stranger aspects of male culture in the modern world is the belief that they can do anything. No matter what the task or the years others have taken to master it, males believe they can just pick up some equipment and do it perfectly. Family portrait photography tends to be the main example of this phenomena.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

How you can save time and money next time you embark on a home decor project. The next few points will assist you in creating perfect match for your home or office decor.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

The bride needs to stand out in a photo. How do you pose a bride with a group of other nice-looking people and make her the center of attention?

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

Photographers get your pre-wedding bridal portraits big guns out. Every bride wants unique portraits.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

Looking for a portable scanner? if you are thinking about the possibility of buying a photograph scanning device and you are not really sure which scanner to buy, join the club! fortunately, there is a way of determining what you need which will help you to find a scanner that will serve all your needs. Using a portable scanner can significantly improve your technique for dealing with digital material, primarily when the storing of critical material is a factor. Before you decide to buy a compact scanner, we recommend that you browse the information that follows.

Like any other sort of state-of-the-art equipment out there, handheld scanners have been designed to be less complex and simpler to use. They’re the right tool for most of your day-to-day scanning requirements, like important cards and receipts that are piling up, contracts, checks… the list goes on. In just a few short moments they provide an extraordinary level of sharpness in formats ranging from images to text. Since they have come down in price, the outlay for a photograph scanning device is both smart and affordable both for companies and individuals.

According to many users, the best thing about mobile scanners like these is their portability so that you can use them no matter where you are. Included with the scanners is a custom scanning program that will allow you to scan printed documents and pictures alike and save the picture or text in an appropriate form. If you want to scan id cards, the device will take the various parts of the card: the photo, the signature, and all the text of the identification and then categorize it in various data fields, into an external document, your clipboard, or any appropriate application.

Prior to buying a photograph scanning device here are several factors you need to keep in mind: (1) decide what you need a scanner for; (2) use your favorite search engine to look for appropriate scanners; (3) see how the various scanners differ in their specifications; (4) be sure that the manufacturer has a good name and check out feedback from past scanner customers; (5) verify delivery rates and refund or exchange practices.

The photography business is not possible without the utilization of specialized equipments and apparatus, because, like other occupations, it is dependent on several supplies and tools. It is with cameras, lenses, shutters, filters and the like that a photographer develops his or her abilities and uses inborn talent.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

The art of photography attracts many people for just as many different reasons, with a few amateur photographers aspiring to transform their hobby into a profession. There are many applications and specialist areas within the field of professional photography from which to carve out a career, all of which are universally fiercely competitive.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

The Canon SD1400IS can be one of your favorite companions in various memorable moments. With its bold colors and easy controls, taking photos of special people and special places is very easy.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

You’ve just bought your first digital camera. You’ve never owned a camera before, not even film. You open the box, take out the manual and there is nothing in there that tells you how to take photos. Just about the workings of the camera. You want to take beautiful photos. So where do you go to begin?

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

Do you have dozens, or even hundreds, of family photos tucked away in boxes or drawers or in the back of closets? Collage picture frames are a great solution for all those pictures that are lying around collecting dust. You can display a collection of photos all at the same time and not have to worry about cluttering up your home with many different small frames.

View full post on Arts and Entertainment: Photography Articles from EzineArticles.com

All I hear on the news today is how bad the property market is. Yes, it’s true that house prices have dropped, but with all the negative talk you’d think that marketing was dead! By this I mean that if you truly want to sell your house within a month, you can. Here are my top tips to sell your house as fast as possible.1) Advertise properly – There are literally thousands of bland, boring ads in the papers and all over the internet. Spruce them up a bit with some good photographs and targeted calls to action. Use phrases like “move your stuff in today” and “own this today”. Avoid acting desperate, and keep things exciting.2) Turn your thumb green – By this I mean your garden. Nothing boosts the curb appeal of a property than having a beautiful front yard or garden. Cut the grass, plant some trees, install a cheap water feature, and generally neaten the place up. If done properly you’ll see a significant boost of pass-byers calling up.3) Kitchen re-modelling – OK, so I don’t mean a complete re-furbishment. I’m talking about the smaller things like the dirty cupboards and dust build-up on top of the fridge. Also look at replacing light fittings and cupboard handles for a boost in perceived value. A good kitchen means a good house in many people’s minds.4) Bathroom tweaking – The bathroom is probably the most important room in the house as far as boosting value. Beautiful light fittings, an air ventilator, some scented soups and candles, and a dirt-free environment are absolutely essential in this room. Again, be as unique as possible, and don’t be scared to be a bit eccentric in your decor.5) Clear out clutter – Get rid of the book cabinet in the corner, move that extra desk, remove all those sofas! The airy and open living room is very much in fashion these days. I guess it’s because the world has become a much more stressful place, and people want to come home to a relaxed mood. Be as minimal as possible.

To check out more tips to sell your house fast, as well as a proven sales strategy, go to this website now: Sold In 21 DaysAlternatively, check out this article: 5 Tips To Sell Your House By The End Of The Month

Calgary is the third largest city in Canada by population. Calgary sees more than its share of weddings in a year. No matter which part of Calgary it is that you are living in, it is good to know that whenever there is a special event in your life that you would like to capture for posterity’s sake – there are a lot of good Calgary photographers that you can get in touch with.  When you go online and search for businesses offering Calgary photography, a lot of results will crop up – which just goes to show how in demand the service of Calgary photographers are.  For weddings, anniversaries, birthdays or for families who would like to have a family picture taken by a professional, you can rest assured that there is a Calgary photographer who will give you the professionalism and quality of work that you deserveLooking for a professional Calgary photography service provider is even more important if you are holding one of the most important events in your life: your wedding.  Aside from the wedding dress, the venue of the wedding reception and the place where the wedding will be held, choosing a wedding photographer is one of the most important decisions that you will ever make.  Remember that at the end of the wedding, your guests may have been satisfied with the food, the party and the drinks that you served – but after all the celebration is over, your wedding pictures will be the one that you will savor and get to look at over and over again for the rest of your life.  Which is the reason why it pays to get the best Calgary photography that specializes in weddings.  When looking for the best Calgary photography service provider, try looking at the wedding albums of your relatives and as who their photographer is. This should give you an idea about the type of work that you are looking for in a professional wedding photographer.  Do not hesitate to shop around for the best Calgary photographers because you do have a lot of options.  Just remember to book early because the services of these professional photographers are highly in demand so their schedules fill up fast. When booking the services of professional Calgary photographers, make sure to pay their studio a visit.  This way, you can be sure that the type of photography work that they offer is exactly what you are looking for. You should also ask whether they offer a combination of black and white, as well as colored films.  For some pictures, being printed or shot in black and white adds a romantic, age-old feeling to the photo.  Also, once you find that one touching wedding picture taken by a photographer, do not hesitate to pay premium dollar for the services that they offer. Your wedding is one of the most important events in your life, so it does deserve to be taken by a professional Calgary photographer who can capture the moment perfectly.

Good content and proper presentation to the engines is important 

The job of the search engine is to find the best sites to present to the person doing a search.  What you need to do then is make sure you site is as good or better at providing the searcher with what they are looking for, and making sure the search engine can determine the quality of your site. 

I can’t tell you what to provide the searcher other than make sure it’s what they are looking for. I can tell you how to present the information to the search engines in a way that they can determine the value and quality of your site. 

High quality content and high quality inbound links 

The search engines have basically two ways of determining your sites ranking.  The first is the content of your site, and the second is the number and quality of the links to your site from other sites. 

Step one would be to produce a high quality website with a lot of high quality useful content that people are searching for.  However, it won’t do you any good if the search engines can’t figure out how good your site is.  You have to present your content in a way that the search engines can use it to determine the quality of the site. 

Let’s take a look at how the search engines figure out what your site is about and how to assign a ranking to it.  Having the best web site on the web won’t do you any good if the search engines can’t figure that out. 

Head section of the web page 

The head section of your web page is the first thing the engines see.  In the head section of your site are some very important elements. The head section contains the meta tags including the title tag and the description tag.  

Importance of the meta title tag 

The title tag tells the search engine what your page is about.  If your title is “John Lund Photography”, the engines will know the page is about John Lund and photography.  If you want to get a high listing when people search for “John Lund” then that is a good title.  But John’s site is a stock photo site and John wants to be ranked high for the keywords “stock photo”.  

John wants to use his site for two purposes; the first being to provide great high-quality stock photos to ad agency’s and people searching for stock photos to use in advertising, and the second to sell advertising on his site. 

Using wordtracker, a keyword research tool, we determined that “funny pictures” and “stock photos” would be his primary target keyword phrases. 

Importance of the description tag. 

The second meta tag in importance is the description tag.  When the search engines display the results it often displays the contents of the description tags under the title. So people decide whether to visit your site by the title and the description.  If you description doesn’t inspire searchers to click through to your site, then getting the high ranking was a waste of time.  

Make sure your description tag accurately reflects what the searcher will find when he gets to your page.  Google and the other engines also use the description tag to help determine what your site is about.

 Keyword tag… not so important

There is also a meta tag for keywords.  Although the engines for the most part don’t use it because of all the keyword stuffing abuse that has occurred, they may still check to see if it is being abused. Don’t stuff a bunch of un-related keywords or repeat keywords. It won’t help and could hurt.  I generally use 5-8 keyword phrases in the keyword tag. 

Body text 

Body text is the next element the engines look at.  If there is little or no body text, the engines won’t be impressed.  When the engine compares your site to your competitors sites, if you have a couple of paragraphs of information, and your competitor has a 800 word page, who do you think will look more important. 

Put 500 to 800 words on a page so that the engines know there is content.  Make sure you have proper grammar and perfect spelling.  The engines are watching.  A page with a bunch of miss-spelled words will not be viewed as a high-quality page.  Also use headings with your keyword phrases worked in.  Keywords in headings are generally given more weight than keywords in body text. 

Don’t stuff extra keywords into your text. Write for humans.  The engines will give a lower weight to body text with too many keywords.  

Photographs and alt image tags 

Search engines can’t determine what a photograph is about from looking at the photo.  The only information available to the engines are the text near the image, the file name of the image, and the alt tag text for the image.  So use a keyword or two in the photo file name, in the alt tag text, and nearby the image.  Again, write for humans. 

Make a sitemap 

Make a sitemap.  Sign up for Google webmaster tools.  Google tells you exactly how to do it.  That way if your navigation proves difficult for the spiders, the sitemap will make sure they can index all of your pages. 

Incoming links to your site 

Get links from other sites.  The engines use the number and quality of links that point to your site as another way to gauge the importance of your site.  Links from spammy and low quality sites will not do you much good.  Links from related sites of high quality will do you a lot of good.  If you have a high-quality site with information that people want, then other sites will link to you. 

Article marketing to obtain one way inbound quality links 

One good way to get links is to do some article marketing.  Write some 500-800 word articles and submit them to the online article directories.  You will get long-term quality links, and you get to choose the anchor text in the links.  

Anchor and link text 

The search engines look at the anchor text in the link, the text around the link, the link text, the page the link is on, and the site the link is on to determine the quality and topic of the link. 

Quantity of content 

Your site needs a lot of content.  If the engines are comparing your site with others, and your site has 20 pages of great content, while the others have 50 or 100 pages of equally good content, which site do you think will be given a higher ranking?  Yep, the bigger site will win. 

You should probably shoot for at least 100 pages of related content.  Use the various elements as they were designed for i.e. title tags, alt tags, description tag, and keyword tags.  Make sure your grammar is proper and there are no miss-spelled words. Provide plenty of body text and use headings. 

Keyword tools for keyword phrases

Use a keyword tool when composing keyword phrases because if you use keyword phrases that are not searched for then they won’t help you get traffic.  

Time and patience 

It takes time for the engines to trust you.  Brand new sites usually need a year or so before the engines really begin to trust your site, so patience is necessary.  Early on you may get some traffic from long-tailed keyword phrases, but it will take time to rise to the top for the really popular search terms where you have lots of competition.

 There you have it.  Follow these instructions and in time your site will rise to the top of the search engine result pages.

Contrary to popular opinion you DO NOT need a website to be a successful online. There are many things you could do without having to go to the expense of buying a domain name or building a website.

For instance, eBay is one of the largest marketplaces in the world; there will be few who haven’t heard of it and everyday millions of people are buying and selling their unwanted items. However, many regular businesses also use it because of the power it has to attract buyers who are interested in a huge range of products and services. You can set up a shop on ebay, for as little as £6.00 per month. You will have to pay a small amount for each set of stock you add to your shop and you will also pay a small amount when someone makes a purchase, but I can guarantee that these figures will be miniscule compared to the costs and time involved in setting up your own website.

I would also like to bet that almost everyone reading this article has used Amazon at some point, if not to buy something then at least to find out about books or CD’s. But did you know that you can also sell your own items on Amazon? If you have a look for anything on this enormous website, you will invariably see something that says “13 used & new available from £0.99″. These listings are small businesses who also stock the same product and who are offering it to the users of Amazon, often at a reduced price.

The service is called Amazon Marketplace and anyone can join for free and sell anything from books or CD’s to consumer electronics. Amazon simply charge you a small commission whenever something is sold and they credit your bank account every month.

Perhaps you are a photographer or graphic designer and if this is the case then online services like Dreamstime maybe the answer. Dreamstime is an online marketplace that sells stock images – in fact all the images that have accompanied these articles have been sourced from Dreamstime. You simply register for an account, which is free once again, load up your images, set a price (in line with their guidelines) and away you go. There are quality checks of course, and not everyone that applies is allowed an account, but if your work is good then it pays to try it out. The way that it works – using myself as an example – is that each time I use an image, I pay a small amount of money (typically $1) to use that image. The image will be sold time after time to many different people. It is also royalty free, which means that I can use the image as I wish, (as a book cover for instance) depending on the version I have bought.

Of course, there are many more variations on all of these themes and I explore more of them in articles about starting an online business at: Grow A Better Business

The recipe for a successful business blog all comes down to the ingredients you put in. Just like with a successful meal, you must plan and organize your thoughts and ideas before you head into the kitchen.
It is best to define your niche as specifically as you can before you start blogging. If this is not possible, you must make every effort to continue this refining process until you know exactly who you are talking to and what you want to convey in your blog posts. This is crucial if you are to create and build a profitable online business based on your blog.
Branding your blog with your name, colors, and design will also be a big part of it. You want to send a message to your visitors that goes beyond the text and images they will see. You want them to feel that they have come to the right place to find the information they are searching for.
Choose your blog categories carefully. Start out with just a few and increase them as you begin to talk about new topics. These categories should include your keywords so that the search engines will begin to know what your blog is about very quickly.
There are also places to purchase royalty free clipart, graphics, and photos to use in your posts. These images will make your blog more interesting and tell your story in a different way than if you only used text. But be careful about using too many images, especially cartoon or childish ones, because that can detract from your credibility on your topic.
Now it is time to plan your blogging schedule. To stick with the recipe analogy, you want to have all of your ingredients close at hand before you start cooking your special dish. My goal is to bring the very best content to my readers in a way they can get the most benefit from it. I want them to leave my blog feeling completely satisfied, yet wanting to return for a second helping. This can be achieved by planning and organization.
Enjoy the process of building your blog over time. You are creating a body of work that will affect many thousands of people over time. Don not rush the process or post about things that are not related to your topic. Even when I write about my personal life I tie it into my niche topic so that my readers will again gain better perspective. When they leave a comment on one of my posts, that is the icing on the cake for me.

Time lapse of an in- and outbox with lot of work in them.

Jim Pickerell has done it all in Photography, from war correspondent, to stock agency owner to industry analyst and publisher of the highly regarded stock industry newsletter Selling Stock. Jim gives us a thorough rundown on his view of the future of stock and suggestions on how to adapt to the changing industry.

Jim, can you share with us your journey into and through photography, into stock, and finally, establishing yourself as the premier industry analyst and commentator?

In high school I worked in a camera store, sold cameras and photo supplies, and processed customer film using the “dip and dunk” method. I attended Ohio University for two years where I majored in photography. At that point I felt I needed more time to practice what I had learned before I finished my degree. I also knew that I had a selective service military obligation after college, so I joined the Navy as a photographer. After Navy photo school was assigned to the Navy photo lab in Yokuska, Japan. Later, I became a Tokyo based staff photographer for Pacific Stars & Stripes, a military newspaper circulated to all military instillations in the Asia/Pacific region, and traveled all over the area on assignments.

After four years in the Navy, I went to UCLA and three years later received a degree in Political Science. During this period I did lab work for UPI and one summer I served as a National Geographic Magazine intern. The day my UCLA class graduated I was on a plane to Tokyo to begin a career as a freelance editorial photographer.

After a summer in Tokyo where I worked hard, but generated almost no income, I got a one-month temporary assignment from UPI to go to Vietnam and cover for them until they could send a staffer out from New York. When my month was up I decided to stay in Vietnam because living was cheap and it seemed to offer more photographic opportunities than anywhere else in Asia at the time, but even that wasn’t much. This was 1963. There were about 15,000 U.S. advisors in country, no U.S. combat units and for the most part it was pretty quiet. I was the only non-Vietnamese freelance photographer based in Saigon at the time. The other two Western photographers were Horst Fass of AP and the New York photographer who replaced me at UPI. A few other Westerners came in an out from time to time, but no one stayed long.

Three weeks later the Vietnamese military overthrew their president, Ngo Dinh Diem. I was the only photographer in Saigon shooting color that day. Earlier that year Life Magazine had decided that they wanted to try to use a color shot from the major news story in the world each week. I came way from that event with my first pictures in any national magazine and a Life cover.

I covered the war in Vietnam for three-and-a-half years with occasional forays into other parts of Asia. During that period I wrote and illustrated a book called Vietnam In The Mud, which sold out its first printing. In 1968 I returned to New York, still with the vision of a career as an editorial photographer. After 8 or 9 months my wife and I moved to Washington, DC.

In Saigon I was in demand as a war photographer, but New York and Washington had plenty of experienced photographers covering business and politics. I was a nobody I began looking for more commercial work. Short of funds, and with a new daughter, in 1969 I took a staff position with Aviation Week & Space Technology. This was the worst year of my photography career. I liked photographing airplanes and manufacturing, but the magazine didn’t have a travel budget for a photographer and I spent a lot of time sitting around. After a year I went back to freelancing with more of a focus on government and commercial assignment work.

All this time I had been submitting outtakes from assignment shoots to several stock agencies. In fact, the Life cover (November 15, 1963 – http://www.oldlifemagazines.com/mag.php?d=111563) was a stock photo as I was shooting on speculation for Black Star that day. Stock sales became a small, but growing part of my overall income. The 1976 copyright act changed things for stock photographers who now owned their production rather than it being owned by the client who assigned the work. More photographers began to produce stock and customer interest began to grow. I began to spend more time in between commercial and some annual report assignments shooting stock. Stock sales became a steadily growing share of my total photography income.

In the early 1980’s I helped establish the mid-Atlantic chapter of ASMP, served two years as Vice President, two as program chairman, two as President and a member of the National Board. One of the issues that arose while I was a national board member was whether ASMP would publish a new edition of their Stock Photography Handbook and pricing guide. The board decided not to do it, but I felt such a book was needed and decided to publish one independently.

The first edition of Negotiating Stock Photo Prices, which featured charts with recommended prices for all types of rights-managed stock photo uses, was published in 1989. I continued to update the book through the 1990’s and the fifth edition was published in 2001.

In 1990 I began publishing Selling Stock, a subscription based newsletter printed six times a year that dealt with all aspects of the stock photography industry. In 1995 we began delivering the articles online as well as in the printed version and steadily increased the frequency to the point that Julia Dudnik Stern and myself average three stories a day five days a week. At the end of 2006 we gave up the printed edition entirely and went exclusively to online delivery.

In 1993 my daughter and I started a Stock Connection, a general interest rights managed stock agency that gave photographers a 75% share of sales. This was the highest royalty share available at that time. Later we found it necessary to reduce the royalty to 65%, but are still operating on that basis. Today we also represent some royalty-free, but the concentration is still in rights-managed sales. We represent a collection of more than 200,000 images from over 400 photographers.

We are on the verge of launching a new online information service – PhotoLicensingOptions – that will expand beyond stock photography and deal with the business side of photography and every possible way that photographers can earn money from the pictures they produce.

One of the hallmarks of my career is that it has been one of continuous re-invention.

Let’s get down to it; can people still make a living at stock?

NO — with a few exceptions. (1) It may be possible if the photographer lives in Eastern Europe, various parts of Asia or other places where the cost of living is low. (2) If the photographer has very low expectations in terms of living standard. (3) If the photographer already has a large collection of imagery in distribution channels he can probably “make a living” for a while provided he cuts his costs and transitions into some other type of photography that guarantees a fixed fee for work produced. Gross stock revenue will decline. (4) And finally, many photographers will be able to supplement another income source with what they can earn from stock licensing, but they will not be able to support themselves on the income from stock licensing alone.

For photographers living and working in the U.S., I think it will be almost impossible to realize a profit from images produced now and going forward. The demand, even for microstock is leveling out or declining, and there is way too much over supply of every subject matter. The supply of good quality imagery will continue to grow at a much faster rate than it has. Prices will continue to fall. As a result no one will ever be able to earn as much as they earned in the past from stock photographs.

Stock can be a supplement to other sources of income, but not a living.

There is a lot of speculation about “tablets” like the Kindle and the iPad possibly leading the way for more image use and therefore a possible boon to stock photo licensing. Do you have any thoughts on that?

The iPad, in particular, has the potential to become a widely used tool in the field of education. Currently, I believe worldwide licensing of stock photography for educational purposes totals something in the range of $350 million a year, but that figure is more likely to decline than grow as a result of the introduction of the iPad.

A lot of images will be used on iPads, but that doesn’t mean professional photographers will be earning more from licensing rights to still images. For the past five years, at least, book publishers have added something like the following to their requests for rights to use a picture in a printed book.

The requests have included, “the right to publish the picture in an unlimited numbers of electronic uses on the Internet, or in any other electronic product now in existence or yet to be invented, for 10 years from the date of invoice.”

Most image sellers have been agreeing to these terms for little or no additional money. Consequently, the rights for most of those iPad educational uses in the next decade have already been given away. Getty Images has been a leader in this giveaway. Find a rights-managed image on their site and you may reproduce it inside a printed book in any size from postage stamp to double page spread and print an unlimited number of copies, for 7 years for $267. If you also want electronic rights for the same book and time period it is available for an additional $120. If you only want to use the image in an electronic book the price is $92 for 10 years. And because publishers tend to be large users of images Getty offers them much more favorable bulk deals.

The theory that there could be a “boom in stock photo licensing” assumes that publishers will continue to print all the books they are currently printing, plus the electronic versions for the iPad and Kindle.. However, I expect the use of printed books to decline rapidly as school systems switch from printed books to electronic. It is likely that professional photographers will lose many more sales than they gain.

For an analogy think of how the demand for right-managed and traditional royalty-free images has declined as microstock and the demand for it has grown. There are a lot more image users now, but the overall revenue from licensing rights to stock images has declined in the last few years. So in one sense there may be a “boom” in that more imagery will be used, but the implication of the question is “will there be a growth in revenue generated” and to that question the answer seems likely to be NO. In addition, the revenue that is generated will be spread among a much larger group of photographers with much more of it going to part timers and amateurs.

Interactive Electronic Whiteboards

The buzz word in delivering educational information today is “Interactive Electronic Whiteboards”. These systems normally include a computer with an Internet hookup, a video projector and a large white board on which the image on the computer screen is projected. The computer can be operated by touching the image on the whiteboard with either one’s finger or sometimes an infrared stylist. The user can write on the board with a colored stylist or fingertip and the information can be easily stored. In some applications students, each with their own personal computer, sit in a classroom, view the professor and the whiteboard at the front of the class, but also have all the information that appears on the whiteboard on their computers in front of them and can interact with each other and make and store their separate notes.

A basic system can be had for about $3,000, and of course that price will drop soon. It is easy to see how the iPad will become the student’s, or the teacher’s, portable computer within this system.

Such systems are not just being used in universities but also installed in K-12 classrooms across the country. In October 2009 the Detroit public school system inked a $40 million, multi-year contract with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt to install its “Learning Village” electronic system throughout Detroit schools. When HMH gets around to licensing rights for use of images in the Learning Village program, and on iPads, I am sure they will argue that the image is not worth anywhere near as much as it was worth in a printed book and therefore want to pay a lot less than $92 for such usages.

These electronic systems will enable school systems and teachers to exercise a lot more control over their lesson plans. School systems will be less dependent on publishers than they have been in the past and will customize their curriculum and lesson plans to a greater extent. They will use the Internet as a resource. When they want photos they will go to Google, Flickr and microstock sites first. People who want to sell to the education market will have to find a way to sell quality work to individual teachers and school systems at very low prices and hope that volume will make up the difference.

The iPad and Interactive Educational Whiteboards are video friendly mediums. I believe there will be a lot more demand for short videos and a lot less demand for still imagery.

Think about science classes. Can magnetism be explained better with a still picture or a short video? What about dissecting a frog? I looked up “dissecting a frog” on YouTube and found 459 videos. Most were not very good and could have benefited from professional lighting, professional camerawork and good sound and narration, but where do you think teachers will go to find visuals that will inspire their students?

Summary

The iPad will be a boom to the education industry, not professional photographers. Elementary students will no longer have to carry heavy book bags, just a simple iPad. They will learn using the tools of their future careers, not outdated 20th Century ways of learning. Tests and additional resources will be available to students wherever they are. Teachers will be able to test and grade online. School systems will save huge amounts of money compared to what they previously spent on books. No longer will university students have to pay $1,000 for the books they need for a semester’s study. They will upload all the educational materials they need onto their iPad for a fraction of that cost.

The need for tons of paper to print test books will be reduced. Trees will be saved. Trucks to carry books to market will no longer be needed. There will be less need for book distribution outlets, or at the very least the need will be for a very different type of distribution outlet. There will be less need for complete packages called books. Experts on various issues currently found within books will discuss their research and findings in shorter articles and teachers will compile a series of such articles into course curriculums.

The world is changing, but not necessarily for the better for those photographers who want to continue to operate based on 20th Century rules.

Comparison shopping tools, such as Spiderpic, are starting to spring up. Do you think those tools will have any real impact on the industry?

Spiderpic will have a major impact on the microstock and subscription segments of the market because it is so easy to compare prices when the price is based on file size. It will be much harder to effectively compare prices on the rights-managed side of the business because there are so many other variables.

Microstock sellers will be pressured to go exclusive and not put their images on multiple sites so some companies can maintain higher prices. When the distributor licenses images as either single images, or part of a subscription the company competes against itself. We also know that those who market the same images through multiple sites always make more money than those represented exclusively by one company.

Dan Heller and Jim Erickson are at opposite ends of the photography spectrum, and yet each appears to be making direct sales work. What can we learn from their success? Does their success bode well for the rest of us?

I don’t know enough about Dan Heller’s business or what he earns from direct sales to speak intelligently about his business model. I have done an extensive story on Jim Erickson and believe there are a few keys to his success. First he is a very good photographer and there will always be a few who are the exception to the rule.

One of the important elements of his success in stock is his strong assignment business. His assignment customers are regular users of his stock. Working closely with art directors on assignments also helps him understand what is needed in stock and I’m sure aids him in developing concept ideas. He also generates enough revenue that he can justify building a very effective site and publishing regular catalogs of just his work. In addition, he had the advantage of building his career when the business was much more viable – on both the stock and assignment sides – than it is today.

Given how the business has changed I do not believe that someone with the same degree of talent and drive could ever achieve what Erickson has achieved as a still photographer.

Timing is important and the heyday of stock photography has passed.

Getty has just added social network licenses to their pricing for RM images. Included are commercial and non-commercial categories. Do you think that the problems of image theft, and the attitude that theft is OK, can be overcome enabling the use of photos on personal blogs and social networks to be monetized?

Unfortunately, I don’t think in today’s society the problem of image theft can be overcome. There is a general attitude in our society that individuals are “entitled” to all kinds of things for which they shouldn’t have to pay. Information on the Internet is just one of those things.

That said, the fact that so many microstock images are being purchased for small uses on the Internet is evidence that a significant number of people are willing to pay something for images. This may not be because buyers recognize that images have any value, but rather because images have been organized in a manner that makes it easy for buyers to quickly find something that works for their projects and thus saves them time. It should be recognized that buyers might not feel any responsibility to pay creators for their efforts; they’re just paying for convenience. The same thing can be said of iTunes.

On the other hand, the creator is getting something rather than nothing for his efforts. The big question is whether that something will be enough to justify continued production on the part of the creator. In the long run, I doubt it will.

Which pundits do you think we should be paying attention to (beside Selling Stock)?

It is natural for people to want a short list of experts to follow. It’s helpful if those experts agree with what the reader wants to hear. But with the technological changes taking place in the photography industry, I’m not sure that any of the pundits (me included) have many of the answers. One of the things that makes prognostication difficult in the photography industry is that there is almost no good, solid public data upon which to base decisions or opinions. Very few individuals or companies make data related to their business operations public.

That said, I think photographers should be listening to everyone who speaks at the annual PhotoEast conference. They should be listening to the leaders of the trade associations and everyone who has written a book about the photography business. To make matters more difficult there are many different aspects to the business of photography, stock photography being only one of them. Part of what each individual must do is figure out whether it is advisable to focus on just one aspect of the business or to work in several different areas. The answer may differ for each individual.

One of the things I’m trying to do with my new site www.photolicensingoptions.com is bring together, in one place, information from experienced experts who work in all the various ways that it is possible to earn money (and hopefully in many cases earn a living) from taking pictures. I want to offer a variety of differing opinions in each subject area from individuals who have enough experience, or have done enough research to justify their point of view.

I want to make useful information easy to find. At that point it will be up to the reader to determine which part of that information will help him or her increase earning from the images produced. Some of this information will also be available in other places on the Internet. But, it is often hard to find. I’ve found that when doing an Internet search it is often necessary to wade through a huge amount of dross in order to find a few useful gems. Photolicensingoptions will deal with a narrow focused issue – the business of photography – and find the gems for readers to consider.

Can you give us a quick rundown of which agencies you think are currently doing the best job for photographers?

Best is a relative term. The stock photo industry is in such a state of crisis that it is hard to say what the best course for any photographer might be. Photographers need to recognize that while agencies are “empowered to act on behalf of the photographer” they are not necessarily acting in the photographer’s best interest. Most agencies are seeing a decline in sales. The goal of most agencies is to maximize profits and that is not necessarily in the best interest of photographers. Most agencies are cutting costs and trying to honestly and fairly service the photographers who have been with them for many years. It is not a good time to jump into the business either as a photographer or agency/distributor.

I favor agencies that try to give photographers a larger share of the revenue collected. I favor agencies that make an attempt to price based on usage rather than file size, but I must acknowledge that the concept of pricing based on usage is waning and pricing by file size is growing more and more popular.

The agencies that focus on selling at low prices, direct to consumers, (microstock) are experiencing the most growth, but the prices are so low that the vast majority of photographers will not benefit.

Consumers do not want to search through hundreds or thousands of sites, each using different search methods, in order to find an image they can use. Consequently, they tend to go to sites where they can find a wide range of imagery of a broad cross section of the photographic community. Thus, photographers need a central place where consumers can go to find their work. But, for the most part these sites make little effort to set prices at levels that are favorable to photographers and they take an unreasonable share or the fees they do collect.

Many agencies make very few direct sales, but instead serve as consolidators of images that are then shipped to a wide range of distributors in order to reach a larger customer base. This may be a necessary service, but a further cut is involved, often leaving the image creator with a very small percentage of the unreasonably low fee that was paid in the first place.

Photographers should make every effort to put the exact same images with as many agencies as possible on a non-exclusive basis. Different agency editors will select different images for often, unfathomable reasons – and that’s OK. In some cases several agencies will select the same image and that’s also OK. Each agency will have some customers that the others will not reach and you want your images to have a chance to be seen by everyone. Some photographers will do well with one agency and other with a different agency. It is usually difficult to predict which agency will be most successful at selling a given photographer’s images. Be suspicious of any agency that wants to be the exclusive representative of your images and make sure they are offering you a significantly better deal than if you place your images with several agencies non-exclusively.

If you were shooting stock (hey, maybe you are…), would you be shooting for RM, RF or Micro…or some combination?

I think rights-managed (RM) is on the way out. It would be nice if customers were willing to pay to use an image based on the value they receive from using it, or to some degree the cost of production. But, that day seems to be passing. No matter what the subject matter there are too many good alternative choices available at much lower prices. Why should customers pay more? Part of the theory behind RM is that customers need exclusive rights to certain images. Some do, but there are way too many similar images competing for those occasional exclusive sales.

Exclusive sales make sense if the photographer is producing something that fulfills a specific need for the customer, and a fee has been negotiated upfront before the work is done (an assignment). But they make no sense when the photographer is shooting on speculation and trying to produce what some unknown customer will want sometime in the future and when the photographer has no idea how many other photographers are simultaneously producing something similar.

Thus, RM images must also be licensed for non-exclusive use and because the price is negotiable agencies often license RM images for prices far below non-exclusive royalty free images. The other problem with RM is that because the photographer and agency must make sure they can track all image use so they can license exclusives when requested, it becomes much more difficult to broadly market the image through multiple distributors.

Royalty-free (RF) has a market advantage over RM because it is non-exclusive. Thus, it is much easier to offer it for licensing through multiple-distributors. However, it is much harder for the average photographer to effectively participate in the RF market. Selling RF through one distributor only (many photographers do this on Alamy) is not a very satisfactory solution because the photographer fails to reach out to all the customers who deal with other distributors. Most RF production companies want to work with a few very experienced photographers who are prepared to produce high-volume. Consequently, most photographers find it very difficult to effectively participate in the traditional RM market.

The other problem with traditional royalty-free is that microstock will eventually cannibalize it because microstock offers the same unlimited use and is cheaper.

I have a problem with both royalty-free and microstock because they price based on file size rather than how the image is to be used. File size has very little to do with the value the customer receives when using an image.

The use of microstock will continue to grow while the use of images priced using the rights-managed and traditional royalty-free models will decline. However, microstock prices are so low, and the share of the fees paid the photographer so small, that it is hard to see how a photographer can earn a reasonable amount of money for his efforts. In addition, the volume of images being added to the collections is growing at such a rapid pace that most photographers will never earn enough to justify the effort they put into producing the images and preparing them for market.

Microstock is trying to find ways to raise its prices without losing its base. It has defined different bodies of work as being of higher quality and priced these images at a higher level. The problem with this strategy is that the higher priced images will never be used by the customers with limited budgets. Thus, those who only license their images at the “higher prices” lose potential sales. The system works for distributors because they don’t care which images sell as long as every customer goes away with something, but on average it doesn’t work to the advantage of photographers.

Microstock has defined a few types of uses as requiring “extended licenses” which in some cases may be negotiated. More use types should fall into the extended license category. Even as it is now the microstock pricing system has grown into something much more complex than the pricing system for traditional royalty-free and it promises to get more complex.

I believe we need a pricing system that makes every image available at all price points rather that arbitrarily assigning each image to a particular category of use based primarily on price. Above a certain base level, I don’t believe it is possible to define certain image groups as being of “higher quality” quality is in the eye of the beholder. Often very basic images are used in ways that justify a high price and the supposed “high quality” images are just what people with small budgets need. We should forget about licensing rights to stock images for exclusive use. When someone needs exclusive rights let them hire a photographer to produce an image on an assignment.

I favor a system that licenses images based on how they will initially be used, but also offers unlimited future use. Customers demand this kind of flexibility because they are unwilling to accurately predict or track future uses. Such a system is not perfect, but it is better than the alternatives we have today. It would be open to some misuse, but no more than the today’s misuses. It is not fair and reasonable to charge businesses the same to use an image as someone whose use is for a personal blog or a school project.

I want to believe that most customers will be honest in disclosing, to the best of their knowledge, how they intend to use the images they license. However, I also recognize that this may no longer be the way most people operate in today’s society. PicScout provides a service to search the Internet for images represented by certain agencies. They find that 85% of the uses they identify are unauthorized or used beyond the original license. It has also come to the attention of many in the industry that for more than a decade major book publishers have been printing many more copies of books than they licensed rights to print. Given these examples maybe there is no way for photographers to get reasonable compensation for their efforts. Maybe the whole idea of licensing stock images as a business is no longer practical for a photographer.

When I first got into stock photography in the 1960s the idea was that stock images were outtakes from assignments, or occasionally something you shot when you had nothing better to do than sit around drinking a beer. There was no great expectation of earning money from such images, but if you did it was a windfall and not something on which you should base a business. Most stock photographers need to return to this way of thinking. If you have the images and you don’t mind the extra administrative work necessary to make the images available for marketing than put them into the market and see what happens. (The administrative work wasn’t as big a problem in the 1960s as it is today because all you had to do was ship the raw film to your agency and you received 50% of any sale made.) But don’t expect any return and look at what you get as a windfall. If your goal is to earn a living taking pictures then focus on projects that provide a guaranteed return when the images are delivered.

I have been predicting that eventually RM, RF and Micro would all be sold on the same sites…and yet Corbis and Veer have just gone in exactly the opposite direction. Veer is no longer selling RM as Corbis attempts to more clearly differentiate its brands. Is this the way the industry is headed?

I think Corbis and Veer are struggling to find a model that works, but I don’t think this new strategy will be successful. I agree that all sites should eventually have images available at all price points.

For such a system to work I believe all the images will have to be priced either on the basis of file size, or of use. As we look to the future I don’t believe a mixture of both will work for very long. I favor a use-based system, but there must be a wide range of defined uses — some very small uses where the fee is only $1.00 and moving steadily up the scale until we come to certain advertising uses that command thousands of dollars. There must be a system that allows the best images to be used for personal as well as commercial purposes.

There needs to be a system that stops trying to define what is best and price it differently. Every customer’s idea of best differs from that of every other customers depending on particular need at a particular time. Editing often rejects more images that would sell in the right market than it keeps. Let the customer see it all, decide what is best and be charged a price that has some relation to the value he will receive depending on how the customer intends to use the image.

Where are the “Rays of hope” for stock photographers?

I think we should remove the word “stock” from this question. It should be “Where are the ‘Rays of hope’ for photographers?”  Photographers have developed skills at seeing and in taking pictures. Shooting stock is not the only way to earn money in photography.

Photographers must recognize that dramatic changes are taking place in the business and it is time to adapt. At one point all professional photographs were produced on glass plates and tintypes. Next they had to be shot on 8×10 of 4×5 sheet film. After that came the 35mm single lens reflex and color. Then we entered the generation of digital with sharper images and more control. Also note that the effective lifespan of each of these methods of producing images became shorter and shorter.

The next stage of communicating with images may be moving more toward video and away from stills. My advice to photographers coming out of school is to throw away the still camera and focus on video.

But the ray of hope is that many of the photographic and business skills already learned can be re-applied in new ways in the visual communication business. It is time for everyone to be considering reinvention. A few may find it unnecessary, but no one should be confident that they will be doing the same kind of work three to five years from now that they are doing today.

Many of your customers will be trying to make old strategies work. Do what they ask, but look for new customers who are on the cutting edge of new ideas. The ray of hope is that those customers are out there.

You have a new project…PhotoLicensingOptions.com. Can you tell us about that project?

I have been writing about the stock photograph business in _Selling Stock for 20 years and involved in stock photography for over 45 years. I am absolutely convinced that it is time for everyone in the stock photography business to start thinking about re-invention and transitioning to some other line of business. There are many other ways photographers can use their skills to earn money.

We hope to publish articles in PhotoLicensingOption.com that will explore all the various ways photographers can earn money from the images they produce. We will examine new developments and trends in each aspect of the business. In this way we hope to help photographers identify and transition into more lucrative and satisfying aspects of the photography business. We plan to provide our readers with a continuing steady stream of quality information from experts in the various photographic disciplines. Initially there is a focus on what is happening in stock, but that will change quickly so check back frequently or sign up for our regular weekly email that summarizes the new stories available.

Readers pay a small fee to read stories of interest. There is no charge unless the reader actually intends to read a particular story. The goal is to bring all the best information on the business of photography together in one place.

Selling-Stock.com has operated on a subscription basis with readers paying $195 a year for a daily service. PhotoLicensingOptions is designed to provide the same quality of information, but at a price of $1.00 or $2.00 when the reader finds something of particular interest. In this way anyone can easily determine, without making a huge initial investment, if any of the information offered is worth the price.

As an agency owner and industry analyst, what are you doing to prepare for the future?

We are looking for ways to maximize the return for our photographers as long as possible. We are also trying to be frank and open with them and help them understand that they need to be thinking about re-invention and transitioning to some other line of work. None of the photographers we represent are totally dependent on us for their livelihood.

We also anticipate that there will come a point where it may be necessary to close the physical agency operation, but given the way we have structured the business that can be accomplished and still keep revenue flowing to our photographers as long as anyone is interested in using their images.

What is the one piece of advice you can offer us veterans who can’t be dissuaded from pursuing stock photograph?

Expect your annual revenue to continue to decline. If you are under 55 the stock photography business will be dead as a way of earning a living long before you are ready to quite working. Plan ahead. Recognize that I am not saying the photography business will be dead, just the stock part of it.

Do you have any advice for newcomers to the field of stock photography?

If you are taking pictures just to have fun, enjoy yourself. If the money you earn from taking pictures is an important part of your support, then look for customers who will give you an assignment to shoot pictures for which they have a specific need and for which they will pay you immediately after you have completed the job. Make sure the pay is sufficient to justify doing the work. If you can’t be happy shooting that kind of pictures then look for another way to earn a living.

Instead of just thinking about how to take a pretty picture of a happy couple that fits some ethnic stereotype learn more about how that picture is to be used. What is the picture supposed to communicate and how do consumers react to such communications? Expand your knowledge beyond just photographic techniques and learn about other ways of communicating information. I recognize that this is easy to say, but hard to do because everyone has a limited amount of time, but those who can do it will be the ones who succeed.

Many of your clients will be trying to make old strategies work. Do what they ask, but look for new clients who are on the cutting edge of new ideas.

And finally, are there any last thoughts you’d like to leave us with?

My career in photography has gone through many stages of reinvention. For me photography has always been about a way to earn a living that was exciting, interesting, challenging and ever changing. I have never been concerned about creating art. I’ve always been more interested in finding clients who would pay me a decent wage and delivering to them the best I knew how to do and more than they expected. None of my images will be remembered as great, or fine art, but I’ve mostly enjoyed the work and I’ve had a lot of satisfied customers. Often when it came time to make a career change I would agonize over it and think things would never be a good as they had been. Almost without exception the work ended up being more enjoyable and satisfying than what I had been doing previously. Aim for enjoying what you do and giving your customers the best you can do. The rest will take care of itself.

Small business owners who want a web site but don’t want to pay for a domain name or for hosting many times will go to a free web hosting service for their web site. They may be doing themselves a disservice in the long run.
These free web hosts may be good for personal sites and photos of your children with their dog, but don’t use them for business. There are several reasons why.
First, most free web hosting companies make their revenues with banner ads. They place these on your web site. Do you really want your customers going to your web site and seeing an ad to another business that you didn’t approve of? Thought not.
Another reason free web hosting doesn’t cut it is the service. Many times the service is poor, if there is any service at all. If you have customer or technical support issues, you’ll want them to be handled promptly or you run the risk of losing customers. Bill and Ted, who work full time as stock boys at the local supermarket, aren’t going to cut it.
Thirdly, most free web hosting services offer limited packages. They may support just one e-mail address or offer a low bandwidth transfer and may not support certain scripts such as Flash or CSS. You’ll want a host that is flexible and able to support the latest web design tools.
Free web hosting isn’t free. You’ll pay for it somewhere along the line. Either it will destroy your company image, sacrifice your customer service, or you’ll have to eventually upgrade to a paid service because the free hosting won’t support your needs.
Because search engines now look for certain characteristics of web sites that many free web hosts do not possess, your customers may not find you when they perform a Google or Yahoo search. Web designers are now incorporating search engine optimization strategies in their design elements and free web hosts simply do not have the resources to support these new tools.
Search engine optimization strategies require savvy coding. You can’t, like in the old days, just write up an HTML page with your trusty HTML editor and FTP it to your host, then wait for the visitors to come. People go online to look for information and they expect to find the best information available. The search engines make that search possible and have figured out how to make searches easier and more trustworthy for searchers. The job of a web designer is to figure out how to design their pages well enough to give search engines the information they need to help searchers find their pages. Free web hosts are more of an obstacle to that end than a help.
If you want a web site that you can be proud of and that visitors will find, do yourself a favor. Don’t use free web hosts.

Do you like to have traditional photos or modern digital photos? Hope, you would like the latter one. It is because the latter gives you much satisfaction than the initial one. Just observe your surrounding people and you would definitely get the evidents. It is the current digital photo printing which is creating huge demands in the online and offline market. Would you like to spend more with the traditional photo studios? Definitely not. When there are many websites offering online digital photo printing at a lower price, then why you would go with the traditional photo studios. Money spent at such old studios can buy you many digital printing photos at the online sources. Is digital photo printing affordable ? Yes, it is affordable. Just with a few bucks you can have your desired photo prints without even compromising at the quality. If you feel insecure here than check out the exciting prices at the popular websites and in the end, you would surely believe it. Where do I get the digital photo printing websites ? It’s quite easy. All you need is to search in the various search engines as well as other ads websites. Choose the one which has good names in the field of digital photo printing and you will gain much satisfaction. Can one expect to get high quality digital photo printing from the online services? Yes, there is no doubt that you would be receiving high quality photos from the online services. Till date most of the customers have found the digital photo printing as the better and appropriate way to have beautiful photos. For further information, you can also check out infinite blogs written by satisfied customers. Are these websites only provide digital photo printing for personal services ? No, it is not like that. Apart from your personal requirements, you can use these websites for your commercial services as well. These websites provide many corporate discounts and offers which would be much profitable for your commercial purpose. What all other services are offered by these websites ? Apart from digital photo printing services, these also sell you other products and services related to photography. These products and services come at lower price but in a higher quality. If you want additional information, then visit these websites to explore more about their other products and services.